Refereed journal articles
Subhi H, Latham K, Myint J, Crossland MD. Functional visual fields: A cross-sectional UK study to determine which visual field paradigms best reflect difficulty with mobility function. In press, BMJ Open Ophthalmology. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018831.
Timmis MA, Allsop J, Baranian M, Baker J, Basevitch I, Latham K, Pardhan S, van Paridon K. Visual search behaviour among individuals with Retinitis Pigmentosa during level walking and obstacle crossing. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 2017, 58: 4737-4746. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-21573
Subhi H, Latham K, Crossland M, Myint J. Functional Visual Fields: Relationship of Central and Peripheral Field to Self-Reported Function. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 2017, 37: 399-408. doi: 10.11111/opo12362.
Latham K, Baranian M, Timmis MA, Fisher A, Pardhan S. Relative Difficulties of Daily Living Tasks with Retinitis Pigmentosa. Optometry & Vision Science, 2017, doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001046.
Smith L, Timmis MA, Pardhan S, Latham K, Johnstone J, Hamer M. Physical inactivity in relation to self-rated eyesight: cross-sectional analysis from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. BMJ Open Ophthalmology, 3 Jan 2017,
Allen P, Latham K, Mann DL, Ravensburgen RHJC, Myint J. The Level of Vision Necessary for Competitive Performance in Rifle Shooting: Setting the Standards for Paralympic Shooting with Vision Impairment. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 Nov 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01731.
Goodman-Deane J, Waller S, Latham K, Price H, Tenneti R, Clarkson J. Differences in Vision Performance in Different Scenarios and Implications for Design. Applied Ergonomics, 55: 149-155, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2016.02.001
Myint J, Latham K, Mann D, Gomersall P, Wilkins AJ, Allen PM. The relationship between visual function and performance in rifle shooting for athletes with vision impairment. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 2016; 2:e000080. doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000080
Latham K, Baranian M, Timmis M, Pardhan S. Emotional Health of People with Visual Impairment Caused by Retinitis Pigmentosa. PLOS ONE, 2015. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145866.
Pardhan S, Latham K, Tabrett DR, Timmis M. Objective analysis of performance of Activities of Daily Living in people with central field loss. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 56: 7169-7178, 2015. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-16556 .
Rae S, Latham K, Katsou MF. Meeting the UK driving vision standards with reduced contrast sensitivity. Eye, 2015. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.188.
Latham K, Baranian M, Timmis M, Pardhan S. Difficulties with goals of the Dutch ICF Activity Inventory: perceptions of those with Retinitis Pigmentosa and of those who support them. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 56: 2381-2391, 2015. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-16237.
Rae S, Latham K, Katsou MF. Distance word acuity, critical print size and driving vision standards. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 98: 459-463, 2015. doi:10.1111/cxo.12292.
Latham K, Katsou MF, Rae S. Advising patients on visual fitness to drive: implications of revised DVLA regulations. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2014. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306173.
Timmis M, Turner K, Latham K. The effect of trial frames on adaptive gait. Gait and Posture, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.10.021.
Latham K. Evaluation of an emotional support service for the visually impaired. Optometry and Vision Science, 90: 836-842, 2013. Link to paper.
Latham K, Chung STL, Allen PM, Tavassoli T, Baron-Cohen S. Spatial localisation in autism: evidence for differences in early cortical visual processing. Molecular Autism,4:4, 2013. doi:10.1186/2040-2392-4-4. Link to paper.
Allen PM, Radhakrishnan H, Price H, Rae S, Theagarayan B, Calver RI, Sailoganathan A, Latham K, O’Leary DJ. A randomised clinical trial to assess the effect of a dual treatment on myopia progression: The Cambridge Anti-Myopia Study. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics,33:267-276, 2013. Link to paper.
Tabrett DR, Latham K. Adjustment to vision loss in a mixed sample of adults with established visual impairment. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 53:7227-7234, 2012. Link to paper.
K Latham, DR Tabrett. Guidelines for predicting performance with low vision aids. Optometry and Vision Science, 89:1316-1326, 2012. Link to paper.
DR Tabrett, K Latham. Important areas of the central binocular visual field for daily functioning in the visually impaired. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 32:156-163,2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00892.x. Link to paper.
T Tavassoli, K Latham, M Bach, SC Dakin, S Baron-Cohen. Psychophysical Measures of Visual Acuity in Autism Spectrum Conditions. Vision Research, 51:1778-1780, 2011. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.06.004. Link to paper.
DR Tabrett, K Latham. Factors influencing self-reported vision-related activity limitation in the visually impaired. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 52:5293-5302, 2011. Link to paper.
K Latham, S Waller, J Schaitel. Do best practice guidelines improve the legibility of pharmacy labels for the visually impaired? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 31:275-282, 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00816.x. Link to paper.
DR Tabrett, K Latham. Derivation of the Acceptance and Self-Worth Adjustment Scale. Optometry and Vision Science, 87: 899-907, 2010. Link to paper.
K Latham, C Usherwood. Assessing visual activities of daily living in the visually impaired. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 30: 55-65, 2010. View pdf.
DR Tabrett, K Latham. Depression in acquired visual impairment. Optometry in Practice, 10: 75-88, 2009. View pdf.
K Latham Petre, CA Hazel, EM Fine, GS Rubin. Reading with eccentric fixation is faster in inferior visual field than in left visual field. Optometry and Vision Science, 77/1:34-39, 2000.
CA Hazel, K Latham Petre, RA Armstrong, MT Benson, NA Frost. Visual function and subjective quality of life compared in subjects with acquired macular disease. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 41: 1309-1315, 2000. View pdf.
EM Fine, CA Hazel, K Latham Petre, GS Rubin. Are the benefits of sentence context different in central and peripheral vision? Optometry and Vision Science, 76/11:764-769, 1999.
K Latham, BT Barrett. No effect of age on spatial interval discrimination as a function of eccentricity or separation. Current Eye Research, 17, 1010-1017, 1998.
K Latham. Who uses contrast sensitivity in optometric practice? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 18/Suppl. 1: 1-18, 1998. View pdf.
K Latham, G Misson. Patterns of cataract referral in the West Midlands. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 17/4: 300-306, 1997.
D Whitaker, K Latham. Disentangling the role of spatial scale, separation and eccentricity in Weber’s law for position. Vision Research, 37/5:515-524, 1997.
K Latham, D Whitaker. A comparison of word recognition and reading performance in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 36/17: 2665-2674, 1996.
K Latham, D Whitaker. Relative roles of resolution and spatial interference in foveal and peripheral vision. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 16/1: 49-57, 1996.
K Latham, D Whitaker, JM Wild. Spatial summation of the differential light threshold as a function of visual field location and age. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 14/1: 71-78, 1994.
D Whitaker, K Latham, P Mäkelä, J Rovamo. Detection and discrimination of curvature in foveal and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 33/16: 2215-2224, 1993.
K Latham, D Whitaker, JM Wild, DB Elliott. Magnification perimetry. Investigative Ophthamology and Visual Science, 34/5: 1691-1701, 1993.
D Whitaker, P Mäkelä, J Rovamo, K Latham. The influence of eccentricity on position and movement acuities as revealed by spatial scaling. Vision Research, 32/10: 1913-1930, 1992.